Up to 80% of team time was consumed by policy information collection and organization—monitoring ministries, the Diet, committees, document searches, reading materials, organizing data, daily reports—as well as internal coordination such as explanations to business units, legal teams, and executives.

As a result, limited resources remained for strategic activities such as stakeholder engagement (meetings and discussions with ministries, lawmakers, and industry groups) and policy advocacy (public comments, proposals, lobbying), leading to missed opportunities.

70% reduction in workload: Automated collection and AI summaries dramatically reduced research burden and eliminated concerns about missed information.

Elimination of knowledge silos: Group tagging enables sharing of veteran expertise, making onboarding smoother for new team members.

Strategic shift: Time saved is redirected toward stakeholder dialogue, improving both the quality and quantity of policy proposals.

More than 20 hours per month were spent translating and preparing materials to report Japan’s complex policy environment to U.S. headquarters. Time lags caused misalignment in decision-making, and heavy reliance on external consultants created challenges in both cost and speed.

Automated English reporting: With Japanese–English bilingual AI summaries, regulatory updates in Japan are instantly available in English, reducing reporting time by 50%.

Faster decision-making: Headquarters and local teams share the same information in real time, enabling discussions to focus on strategy rather than status explanations.

Cost optimization: Reduced dependence on external resources while improving overall information quality.

Monitoring expert committee materials, public comments, minutes, and draft legal amendments across ministries became overwhelming. As professionals, missing information was unacceptable, yet similar tasks had to be repeated across multiple clients—creating strong demand for efficiency.

Dramatic time savings: Automated monitoring and report generation improved research efficiency by 90%, eliminating repetitive work.

Higher-value advisory: Visualization of the policy discussion timeline leading up to legal amendments, beyond what statutory databases provide, deepened client insights.

Consistent service quality: Tag-based client information management ensures accurate, high-quality monitoring without omissions.

As social issues grow more complex, the next generation must actively engage in rule-making and practice EBPM (Evidence-Based Policy Making).
 However, rapid advances in digital technology have expanded the required skill set for handling policy information, making digital and AI literacy essential.

In existing learning environments, excessive time was spent collecting scattered information, limiting opportunities for meaningful discussion grounded in real policy processes and advanced research focused on societal implementation.

Advancing education and research: Automated collection and alerts enable real-time tracking of policy trends, while AI summaries visualize key discussion points and significantly reduce research time.

Efficient project management: Group tagging organizes information by seminar, project, or research theme—promoting knowledge sharing and reducing reliance on individual researchers.

Practice-oriented learning: Automated report generation visualizes policy-making processes themselves, enabling hands-on learning connected to real-world issues.

“Law became something personal.”
 polisee not only improves accessibility to information, but also fosters mindset shifts and deeper intellectual curiosity among students.

Dramatically improved usability
 “Previously, we spent enormous time gathering materials for theses. With polisee’s issue lists and tagging, information is structured and highly effective for education and research.”

A fresh way to learn about the future
 “Learning not only how laws are interpreted, but how they are created, was eye-opening. Understanding policy lifecycles and multi-stakeholder processes made the connection between law and practice tangible.”

A stronger sense of ownership
 “By thinking through real societal issues ourselves, law truly felt relevant. Learning through concrete impacts on companies and society was incredibly valuable.”